Papers
We include the papers on this page to ensure timely dissemination on a noncommercial basis. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the authors or by other copyright holders, notwithstanding that they have offered their works here electronically. It is understood that all persons copying this information will adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by the copyrights. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.
If you can not see the publications, please refresh the page.
ZORA Publication List
Download Options
Publications
-
2019
-
On the Effectiveness of Manual and Automatic Unit Test Generation: Ten Years Later 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2019.00028
-
Scented Since the Beginning: On the Diffuseness of Test Smells in Automatically Generated Test Code Journal of Systems and Software, 156, 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.016
-
-
2018
-
On the Usage of Pythonic Idioms Onward!, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1145/3276954.3276960
-
Continuous code quality: are we (really) doing that? 790–795. https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3240729
-
Continuous Refactoring in CI: A Preliminary Study on the Perceived Advantages and Barriers 564–568. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2018.00068
-
OCELOT"" A Search-Based Test Data Generation Tool for C Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Montpellier. https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3240477
-
Un-Break My Build: Assisting Developers with Build Repair Hints 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196321.3196350
-
An Empirical Investigation on the Readability of Manual and Generated Test Cases Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Program Comprehension, ICPC, Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196321.3196363
-
Exploring the Integration of User Feedback in Automated Testing of Android Applications 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330198
-
How High Will It Be? Using Machine Learning Models to Predict Branch Coverage in Automated Testing 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MALTESQUE.2018.8368454
-
BECLoMA: Augmenting Stack Traces with User Review Information SANER, Campobasso. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330252
-
Context Is King: The Developer Perspective on the Usage of Static Analysis Tools 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330195
-
We’re doing it live: A multi-method empirical study on continuous experimentation. Information and Software Technology, 99, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.02.010
-
-
2017
-
Recommending and Localizing Change Requests for Mobile Apps based on User Reviews 39th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2017), Buenos Aires. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2017.18
-
Analyzing APIs Documentation and Code to Detect Directive Defects 39th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2017)., Buenos Aires. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2017.11
-
Reducing Redundancies in Multi-Revision Code Analysis IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), Klagenfurt. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2017.7884617
-
Analyzing Reviews and Code of Mobile Apps for Better Release Planning IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), Klagenfurt. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2017.7884612
-
An Empirical Analysis of the Docker Container Ecosystem on GitHub 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2017.67
-
-
2016
-
Bifrost - supporting continuous deployment with automated enactment of multi-phase live testing strategies Proceedings of the International Middleware Conference, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2988336.2988348
-
ARdoc: App Reviews Development Oriented Classifier 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Seattle. https://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2983938
-