‘Please ask your questions about AI here…’
Ask questions, and we’ll get an idea of what people want to know.
That gives some direction to the wiki.
I think that we need a section where people can say what they want to see on this AI Wiki.
- – MartinSondergaard.
… looking for a section on quantum computing / AI interface …
- interface, meaning topics that relate to both? or a literal interface between an A.I. program and quantum computing?
- On both counts there’s probably not that many people around with the requisite expertise to write a section…
- I know that there are some faster quantum computing algorithms for doing some algorithms that would be useful to A.I., like search and
- perhaps even NP-completeness (no poly-time NP-complete quantum algorithm yet but i think there’s no proof that one doesn’t exist yet either, even if P \neq NP)
- As for a literal interface, why would you have a specific AI/quantum computing interface? seems to me that a general quantum computing gateway would be good enough
- Of course perhaps eventually quantum computing will let you do even more wacky AI stuff, beyond making current algorithms run faster, but who can tell…
- – BayleShanks
See also:
http://math.ucsd.edu/~dmeyer/teaching/seminar02fall.html<BR>
- I’m not at all happy about the above link being on this wiki. The information concerning neural nets is quite simply wrong. Consider the following quote: “Like biological synapses, the virtual synapses grow stronger with use and weaken with disuse. Repeated input to a neural network wears a distinct path through the neurons. In other words, neural networks learn.”
- --GL7
- Sounds like a reasonable intuitive characterization of some sorts of neural nets to me (Hebbian-style sequence learning, I guess). But regardless, if you don’t like the link, I say go ahead and remove it. – BayleShanks
- The article in question was written by Eric Smalley, founding editor of Technology Research News, and first appeared on 10 July 2002. Regardless of any opinion as to the veracity of its characterization of learning in artificial networks, the link is of primary relevance as a lay description of quantum neural network research currently underway in the United States. Rather than eliminating any and all reference to the research itself, I would recommend changing the link to the source program referred to at WSU?. Elizabeth Behrman recently hosted the NSF? NIPS? (Neural Inspired Computing Systems) Quantum Neural Computing Workshop, and she should be recognized for her continued efforts in the area.
http://webs.wichita.edu/physics/behrman/behr.htm<br>http://webs.wichita.edu/physics/behrman/NIPS.htm
http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/users/ronc/quantum3/node1.html<BR>
http://virtual01.lncc.br/~giraldi/qc/Quantum-Neural-Nets/Research/Research.html
Hi,
may be a little off-topic:
I’m studying Rudolph Carnap’s “Logical Structure of the World”. Are there any works which are dealing with some sort of application of his “fictive construction”(which showes (a possible way) how an individual, with no knowledge but its experience and a number of logical means learns to build its terms)? Or are the early logical empiricists not longer noticed by computer scientists? Thanks!
-Josef
Automation with Chatbots
Hi,
I’m study Technical Informatics in Germany. I searched several days in the WWW? for a open source software which do things for me through a chatbot interface. A simple example: I want a little textbox where I can type “Hey Computer, I’m go smoking”. This means I’m not in my room for 10 miuntes and the computer should turn the music off and lock itself.
Anything I found was the ALICE? Bot and the CyN Project. This is a good point to start development of such a software. But I think anybody have had the same idea and developed such a software but I dont’t find it.
Do you know anything which help me further in this topic?
Thanks and Good Night - Stefan
Is there a place on this wiki for
strong AI hypothesis humor?